Compare specs
Compare Apollo Explore 2.0 and Circooter Landturbo Specs & Performance
Select different scooters below to update your comparison.
Side-by-Side Scooter Specs Comparison
Compare detailed specifications of both electric scooters — from motor power and battery range to weight, price, and features.
Comparison Review: Apollo Explore 2.0 vs Circooter Landturbo
Here's how the Apollo Explore 2.0 stacks up against the Circooter Landturbo — from speed and range to comfort and features.
The Apollo Explore 2.0 and Circooter Landturbo are two electric scooters released in 2025, catering to different rider needs and preferences. The Apollo Explore 2.0 is priced at $899 and offers a top speed of 25 MPH, powered by a 1440W nominal motor. With a maximum range of 25 miles, it features a robust 48V battery with a capacity of 648 Wh. Designed primarily for street riding, it weighs 60 lbs and supports a weight limit of 265 lbs. The Explore 2.0 is equipped with advanced safety features, including drum and electronic brakes, and boasts an IP66 rating, making it more resistant to dust and water.
On the other hand, the Circooter Landturbo is a more budget-friendly option at $549.99, reaching a higher top speed of 28 MPH with its 800W nominal motor. It offers a slightly longer range of 28 miles, powered by a 48V battery with 624 Wh capacity. Weighing in at 58.4 lbs, it can support a weight limit of 330 lbs. The Landturbo is versatile for hybrid terrain and comes with disc and electronic brakes, although it has a lower IPX4 rating for water resistance.
Both scooters come with similar features like speed modes, cruise control, and location tracking. However, the Apollo Explore 2.0 is more suitable for riders seeking durability and advanced safety, while the Circooter Landturbo appeals to those prioritizing higher speed and weight capacity at a lower price point. Ultimately, your choice should align with your specific riding needs and budget.
Related Comparisons
Discover similar side-by-side matchups that might interest you.
No related comparisons found for this pairing.

