Compare specs

Compare Apollo Explore 2.0 and NIU KQi 100F Specs & Performance

Select different scooters below to update your comparison.

Primary

Apollo Explore 2.0

Apollo Explore 2.0

Apollo$899

Street
25 MPH 25 miles

Secondary

NIU KQi 100F

NIU KQi 100F

NIU$356.15

Street
17.4 MPH 18 miles

Side-by-Side Scooter Specs Comparison

Compare detailed specifications of both electric scooters — from motor power and battery range to weight, price, and features.

BrandApolloNIU
NameExplore 2.0KQi 100F
Price$899$356.15
Release Year20252024
Release QuarterQ3Q4

Comparison Review: Apollo Explore 2.0 vs NIU KQi 100F

Here's how the Apollo Explore 2.0 stacks up against the NIU KQi 100F — from speed and range to comfort and features.

The NIU KQi 100F and Apollo Explore 2.0 are two electric scooters catering to different needs and preferences. The KQi 100F, priced at $356.15 and released in 2024, features a top speed of 17.4 MPH, powered by a 300W nominal motor that peaks at 600W. With a maximum range of 18 miles, it is suitable for shorter commutes. Weighing 38.8 lbs and supporting a weight limit of 265 lbs, it offers a convenient folding mechanism for easy transport.

In contrast, the Apollo Explore 2.0, available for $899 and set to launch in 2025, boasts a more powerful 1440W motor, reaching a top speed of 25 MPH. This model also extends its range significantly, with a maximum of 25 miles on a single charge. Weighing 60 lbs and sharing the same weight capacity of 265 lbs as the KQi 100F, it provides additional features like self-healing tires and location tracking. Both scooters are equipped with pneumatic tires and drum brakes, ensuring a safe riding experience.

Ultimately, choosing between the NIU KQi 100F and Apollo Explore 2.0 hinges on your specific requirements. If you prioritize affordability and shorter trips, the KQi 100F is a solid choice. However, for those seeking higher speeds and longer ranges, the Apollo Explore 2.0 is the better option.

Related Comparisons

Discover similar side-by-side matchups that might interest you.

No related comparisons found for this pairing.