Compare specs
Compare Apollo Explore 2.0 and NIU KQi 200F Specs & Performance
Select different scooters below to update your comparison.
Side-by-Side Scooter Specs Comparison
Compare detailed specifications of both electric scooters — from motor power and battery range to weight, price, and features.
Comparison Review: Apollo Explore 2.0 vs NIU KQi 200F
Here's how the Apollo Explore 2.0 stacks up against the NIU KQi 200F — from speed and range to comfort and features.
The NIU KQi 200F and Apollo Explore 2.0 are both formidable electric scooters released in 2025, but they cater to different preferences and needs. The KQi 200F is priced at $529, offering a top speed of 20 MPH powered by a 350W nominal motor, while the Explore 2.0, at $899, boasts a higher top speed of 25 MPH with a robust 1440W nominal motor. This significant difference in power allows the Apollo model to handle steeper inclines, rated at 25°, compared to the KQi's 11.3°.
In terms of battery capabilities, the KQi 200F provides a maximum range of 33.6 miles with a 365 Wh capacity, which is impressive for daily commutes. However, the Explore 2.0, with a slightly lower range of 25 miles, compensates with a higher capacity of 648 Wh. Both scooters feature pneumatic tubeless tires and are designed for street riding, but the Explore 2.0 offers a more advanced suspension system with both front and rear springs for enhanced comfort.
Safety features are comparable, with both scooters equipped with drum and electronic brakes and bright lights, but the Explore 2.0 has a higher IP rating of IP66, making it more resistant to dust and water. Additionally, the Apollo model includes features like turn signals and self-healing tires, providing extra convenience.
For those looking for a more budget-friendly option with a longer range, the NIU KQi 200F is a solid choice. On the other hand, if performance and advanced features are a priority, the Apollo Explore 2.0 justifies its higher price. Ultimately, your decision will depend on whether speed and advanced technology or range and cost-effectiveness are more important to you.
Related Comparisons
Discover similar side-by-side matchups that might interest you.
No related comparisons found for this pairing.

