Compare specs

Compare Apollo Explore 2.0 and NIU KQi 300X Specs & Performance

Select different scooters below to update your comparison.

Primary

Apollo Explore 2.0

Apollo Explore 2.0

Apollo$899

Street
25 MPH 25 miles

Secondary

NIU KQi 300X

NIU KQi 300X

NIU$799

Hybrid
23.7 MPH 37.3 miles

Side-by-Side Scooter Specs Comparison

Compare detailed specifications of both electric scooters — from motor power and battery range to weight, price, and features.

BrandApolloNIU
NameExplore 2.0KQi 300X
Price$899$799
Release Year20252024
Release QuarterQ3Unknown

Comparison Review: Apollo Explore 2.0 vs NIU KQi 300X

Here's how the Apollo Explore 2.0 stacks up against the NIU KQi 300X — from speed and range to comfort and features.

The NIU KQi 300X and Apollo Explore 2.0 are two compelling electric scooters, each with unique strengths. The KQi 300X, priced at $799 and released in 2024, offers a top speed of 23.7 MPH and a maximum range of 37.3 miles, powered by a 500W nominal motor that peaks at 1000W. It features a front hydraulic suspension and a combination of mechanical and electronic brakes, ensuring a smooth ride on hybrid terrain. With an IP55 rating, it provides decent water resistance for various weather conditions.

In contrast, the Apollo Explore 2.0, available for $899 and launched in 2025, reaches a higher top speed of 25 MPH but has a shorter range of 25 miles. Its powerful motor delivers 1440W nominal and 1600W peak capabilities, handling inclines up to 25°. The Explore 2.0 utilizes a front and rear spring suspension for street riding, along with drum and electronic brakes, and boasts a robust IP66 rating for enhanced water protection.

Both scooters offer app connectivity, speed modes, and cruise control. However, the KQi 300X is lighter at 48.7 lbs compared to the 60 lbs of the Explore 2.0, making it easier to transport. Your choice may depend on whether you prioritize speed and power or range and weight.

Related Comparisons

Discover similar side-by-side matchups that might interest you.

No related comparisons found for this pairing.