Compare specs
Compare Apollo Explore 2.0 and Segway GT3 Specs & Performance
Select different scooters below to update your comparison.
Side-by-Side Scooter Specs Comparison
Compare detailed specifications of both electric scooters — from motor power and battery range to weight, price, and features.
Comparison Review: Apollo Explore 2.0 vs Segway GT3
Here's how the Apollo Explore 2.0 stacks up against the Segway GT3 — from speed and range to comfort and features.
The Apollo Explore 2.0 and Segway GT3 are two compelling electric scooters released in 2025, each catering to different needs and preferences. The Apollo Explore 2.0 is priced at $899, featuring a top speed of 25 MPH, a 1440W nominal motor, and a maximum range of 25 miles. It weighs 60 lbs and has a weight limit of 265 lbs, making it suitable for various riders. Its battery takes about 8 hours to charge and offers a 48V, 648 Wh capacity. The scooter is equipped with front and rear spring suspension, drum and electronic brakes, and an IP66 rating for water resistance.
In contrast, the Segway GT3 comes at a higher price of $1631.99, boasting a top speed of 31 MPH and a more powerful 1200W nominal motor that peaks at 2400W. It has an impressive range of 45 miles and charges in just 5.5 hours with a 46.8V, 899 Wh battery. Weighing 87.1 lbs and supporting a weight limit of 330 lbs, the GT3 features a hydraulic suspension for enhanced comfort and ride quality. It includes advanced safety features like hydraulic disc brakes and an IPX6 rating. Both scooters offer a range of smart features, including app connectivity and cruise control.
Ultimately, your choice between the Apollo Explore 2.0 and the Segway GT3 will depend on your specific needs. If you prefer a more affordable option with decent speed and range, the Apollo Explore 2.0 is a solid choice. However, if you prioritize higher speed and a longer range, the Segway GT3 may be the better investment.
Related Comparisons
Discover similar side-by-side matchups that might interest you.
No related comparisons found for this pairing.

