Compare specs
Compare Gyroor H40 and Segway ZT3 Pro Specs & Performance
Select different scooters below to update your comparison.
Side-by-Side Scooter Specs Comparison
Compare detailed specifications of both electric scooters — from motor power and battery range to weight, price, and features.
Comparison Review: Gyroor H40 vs Segway ZT3 Pro
Here's how the Gyroor H40 stacks up against the Segway ZT3 Pro — from speed and range to comfort and features.
The Gyroor H40 and Segway ZT3 Pro are two electric scooters that cater to different needs and budgets. The Gyroor H40, priced at $199, is designed for urban commuting with a modest top speed of 10 MPH, powered by a 180W rear motor. It features a lightweight design at 9.3 lbs and has a weight limit of 143 lbs, making it a suitable option for light riders. With a battery capacity of 56 Wh, it takes just 2 hours to charge, offering convenience for short trips. However, it lacks suspension and is limited to street riding with solid tires.
In contrast, the Segway ZT3 Pro stands out with a premium price of $849.99 and robust features. It boasts a remarkable top speed of 24.9 MPH, driven by a powerful 650W rear motor that can peak at 1600W. This scooter is built for versatility, handling both hybrid terrains with pneumatic tubeless tires and equipped with front and rear spring suspension for a smoother ride. With an impressive maximum range of 43.5 miles and a battery capacity of 597 Wh, it offers extensive travel capabilities. The ZT3 Pro also includes advanced safety features like mechanical disc brakes and an IPX5 rating for water resistance.
Ultimately, the choice between the Gyroor H40 and Segway ZT3 Pro hinges on your riding needs and budget. The H40 is ideal for budget-conscious commuters seeking a lightweight and straightforward scooter, while the ZT3 Pro appeals to those willing to invest in a high-performance model with advanced features and greater versatility.
Related Comparisons
Discover similar side-by-side matchups that might interest you.
No related comparisons found for this pairing.

