Compare specs
Compare Kaabo Mantis X Plus and NIU KQi 100P Specs & Performance
Select different scooters below to update your comparison.
Side-by-Side Scooter Specs Comparison
Compare detailed specifications of both electric scooters — from motor power and battery range to weight, price, and features.
Comparison Review: Kaabo Mantis X Plus vs NIU KQi 100P
Here's how the Kaabo Mantis X Plus stacks up against the NIU KQi 100P — from speed and range to comfort and features.
The NIU KQi 100P and the Kaabo Mantis X Plus are two electric scooters designed for different user needs and budgets. The KQi 100P, priced at $349, features a top speed of 17.4 MPH powered by a 300W nominal motor, making it suitable for urban commuting. With a maximum range of 18 miles, it is equipped with a 48V battery and offers a weight limit of 265 lbs. Its lightweight design at 38.1 lbs and features like cruise control and a folding mechanism enhance its portability, while the front fork suspension ensures a comfortable ride on city streets.
On the other hand, the Mantis X Plus, which retails for $1,199, boasts a significantly higher top speed of 31 MPH thanks to its dual 1000W motors. This powerful scooter can tackle inclines up to 25° and offers an impressive maximum range of 46 miles, supported by an 873.6 Wh battery. Weighing 64 lbs, it has a sturdy build with an ample deck size, providing stability and comfort. The scooter is equipped with advanced safety features including mechanical and electronic disc brakes, adjustable suspension, and turn signals, making it ideal for those looking for performance and safety combined.
In summary, if you are looking for an economical, lightweight option for short urban trips, the NIU KQi 100P is a solid choice. However, for those wanting high speed, extended range, and advanced features, the Kaabo Mantis X Plus is worth the investment. Consider your riding needs and budget before making a decision.
Related Comparisons
Discover similar side-by-side matchups that might interest you.
No related comparisons found for this pairing.

